The authority record for autonomous AI agents.
We reconstruct every agent trajectory against the authority it was actually granted — and make that provable to a regulator, a board, or a customer.
Adoption is exponential. Governance isn't.
Sources: Gartner 2026 enterprise agent forecasts · Identity Defined Security Alliance, 2026 · 2026 survey of 900+ security leaders
Regulators just confirmed the gap — in writing.
Three questions per trajectory. Nobody answers all three.
Braintrust, Arize, Langfuse, Galileo — deep on the trace, silent on whether it should have happened at all.
Credo AI, Holistic AI, Trustible — deep on policy language, but they don't sit in the execution path.
Reconstructs each trajectory against the authority the agent was actually granted. Continuous, cross-vendor, evidence-grade.
The authority record for autonomous agents.
Ingest
Pull trajectories from any agent framework, orchestrator, or MCP toolchain — vendor-agnostic by design.
Reconstruct
Cross-reference each trajectory against the authority actually granted: who delegated it, what it was scoped to, what changed.
Attest
Produce tamper-evident, defensible evidence — and escalate in real time the moment a trajectory steps outside its granted authority.
The open quadrant.
Trajectory-security and identity tools prove the underlying data is capturable — but each stays framed to one budget: security, or access control.
Compliance tools own the regulatory language, but never sit in the runtime.
Warrant is the only one built to hold both, across every risk lens — thirty-plus vendors mapped across six clusters, and none of them answer whether a trajectory was within the authority actually granted.
A technical team that moved into governance.
Every enterprise deploying agents will be asked this eventually.
Was this action authorized — and can you prove it? We're looking for early design partners in regulated financial services, and a founding engineer to help us build. If either sounds like you, we'd like to talk.
hello@warrant.ai